New here? Get your first assignment done for free by top experts on coursepivot!

Create your first order and get 80% cashback within 24 hours

Law Revision 05

What remedy does Heidi have in this scenario?

  • Heidi is entitled to recover her $8000 and any other damages she may be
    able to prove, including compensatory, consequential, and incidental damages.
    Cynthia orders 100 shirts priced at $4.99 each for her screenprinting business
    from Juan, a shirt supplier. The shirts are supposed to be delivered within three
    days, but they do not arrive, so Cynthia runs down to a local store during her
    lunch break and buys another 100 shirts so that she can fill her customers’ orders
    on time.
    What remedy does Cynthia have in this scenario?
  • Cynthia can cancel her contract with Juan and recover the price she paid
    for his shirts. Additionally, she can recover from Juan any money she paid for
    shirts from the local store that exceeded her original contracted cost.
    14
    Cynthia orders 100 shirts in a variety of colors for her screenprinting business
    from Juan, a shirt supplier. When Cynthia receives the shirts, she sees that they are
    not the same brand that she ordered. Nevertheless, she accepts delivery. Within a
    couple of weeks, Cynthia notices that the stitching on half of the shirts is
    unraveling, rendering the shirts unsellable to her customers. She had no indication
    that the shirts had defective stitching when she accepted delivery.
    What remedy does Cynthia have in this scenario?
  • If Cynthia notified Juan of her acceptance of non-conforming goods, she
    can recover what she paid for the shirts, since she will not be able to resell them.

Why are laws to protect property ownership important to society?

  • They are fundamental to peace and stability.
    20
    A roll of $100 bills lying on the street in front of you is __.
  • tangible fungible private property
    When does a bailee owe a bailor an extraordinary duty of care?
  • When the bailment only benefits the bailee
    Select the true statement regarding inherited or gifted real property.
  • A gift of real property must include the deliverance of a deed in order for
    title to be conveyed.
    Select the true statement regarding adverse possession of real property.
  • To successfully acquire real property through adverse possession, the
    possessor’s possession must be observable.
    Select the true statement regarding real property purchases.
  • A written contract is required by law.
    A deed transferring complete ownership of a two-acre plot of land to you with
    no limitations or restrictions would be __.
  • a fee simple absolute interest
    A deed transferring land to you to own and possess during your natural
    lifetime would be __.
  • a life estate interest
    A deed transferring ownership of a house to you once your mother chooses to
    move out of the house and into a nursing home would be __.
  • a reversionary interest
    According to the Copyright Clause, intellectual property rights are important
    because they __.
  • encourage creativity and the invention of new products
    Unit 3, Challenge 2
    Which of the following is a patentable item?
  • A genetically modified lab rat
    21
    Which of the following is a patentable item?
  • A process for testing the mineral composition of a layer of earth
    Which of the following is a patentable item?
  • A new pharmaceutical drug to treat cancer
    Tina, a newspaper reporter, is having lunch at a restaurant and finds a piece of
    paper on the floor. The paper turns out to be the secret recipe used by a local,
    highly successful BBQ catering company. Tina publishes the recipe in the paper
    the next day.
    Does Tina’s conduct violate trade secret law?
  • No, because the company did not do all reasonable and necessary things to
    maintain the recipe’s secrecy.
    Ted wants to discover the secret algorithm developed by a successful software
    company to pair local dog owners with potential playmates for their dogs. Ted
    offers an employee at the company $20,000 to show him each step of the algorithm
    so that he can create a similar app.
    Does Ted’s conduct violate trade secret law?
  • Yes, because Ted misappropriated the software company’s trade secret
    Marie wants to discover the chemical formulation of a popular cleaning solution
    whose ingredients are a trade secret. She experiments with different combinations
    of chemicals until she is able to reproduce the cleaning solution exactly. Marie
    then produces and markets her own version of the cleaning solution.
    Does Marie’s conduct violate trade secret law?
  • No, because the method by which Marie discovered the trade secret is legal
    according to trade secret law.
    Select the answer that best applies to the Google logo.
  • This logo is an example of a service mark.
    Select the statement that best applies to the shape of the Coca-Cola bottle.
  • This shape is an example of trade dress.
    Select the statement that best applies to the phrase “Hawaiian pineapple.”
  • This phrase is an example of a certification mark for a pineapple product.
    22
    Gertrude, a literature professor, copies and distributes the full text of a
    copyrighted novel she’s teaching without permission from the copyright owner. She
    does this in order to help out some of her students who can’t afford to buy the
    book.
    Select the correct classification for this example.
  • Direct copyright infringement
    Harvey, a blogger, quotes several lines of dialogue from a copyrighted movie in his
    latest blog post. His blog post is a review of the film, and he does not obtain
    permission from the copyright owners.
    Select the correct classification for this example.
  • Fair use
    Cara builds a software program that allows users to download copyrighted movies
    without permission from the copyright owners.
    Select the correct classification for this example.
  • Contributory infringement

  • Unit 2, Challenge 3
    Unlike a crime, a tort __.
  • is governed by common law
    Unlike a crime, a tort __.
  • is a wrong which has a legal remedy of damages
    Unlike a crime, a tort __.
  • is a wrongdoing against a private individual
    In an effort to boost sales, a small-scale clothing company prints an image of a
    famous musician’s face on its new run of shirts.
    Which type of intentional tort does this represent?
  • Invasion of privacy
    A young women is walking home at night when a large man jumps out from behind
    some bushes and verbally threatens her.
    Which type of intentional tort does this represent?
  • Assault only
    A hotel owner has a customer who refuses to pay his bill at the end of his stay. The
    hotel owner gets very angry. He tells the customer that he may not leave without
    paying, and if he tries to, the owner will sue him.
    15
    Which type of intentional tort does this represent?
  • This action does not rise to the level of an intentional tort.
    A toddler spills a cup of juice on the floor of a grocery store. An employee sees the
    spill, but he’s too busy to clean it up right away or mark it with a sign, and no one
    else notices it. A few minutes later, a shopper slips on the juice and falls, but
    fortunately, she’s not hurt and she continues her shopping.
    Is the store liable for negligence if the shopper later sues?
  • Yes, but only if the shopper can demonstrate that she was actually injured.
    A woman is driving down the road and sees two bicyclists crash into one another.
    They are clearly hurt and in need of help, but because she is late for work, she
    doesn’t stop.
    Is the woman liable for negligence if one of the bicyclists later sues?
  • No, because no duty of care existed between the woman and the bicyclists.
    A pharmaceutical company produces a drug to control blood pressure, but it’s
    taken off the market after a number of consumers suffer strokes that some believe
    are linked to the medication.
    Is the pharmaceutical company liable for negligence in the case of a lawsuit?
  • Yes, but only if causation can be established.
    A large hole in the sidewalk in front of a pet supply store is being repaired. A
    customer trips on the hole when leaving the store and breaks her ankle. She sues
    the store for negligence.
    Assuming it is true, which of the following would represent at least a partial
    defense against the negligence claim?
  • The store owner had placed a sign over the hole saying, “Caution, watch
    your step.”
    A man is in a car accident, and a woman who sees the accident rushes over to help
    him. The man ends up with permanent partial paralysis resulting from the woman’s
    care. The injured man later sues the woman for negligence.
    Assuming it is true, which of the following would represent a strong defense
    against the negligence claim?
    16
  • Although she was not medically trained or a first responder, the woman
    was attempting to deliver first aid to the man.
    A pedestrian walks into a crosswalk and is hit by a bicyclist and injured. The
    pedestrian sues the bicyclist for negligence.
    Assuming it is true, which of the following would represent at least a partial
    defense against the negligence claim?
  • The pedestrian had headphones on, was busily engaged in texting, and did
    not look up before entering the crosswalk.
    Unit 2, Challenge 4
    A bicycle rider falls and injures himself.
    To successfully sue the bicycle manufacturer for strict liability, what would the
    bicycle rider need to prove?
  • That the product design or manufacturing process was flawed in a way that
    caused the fall
    A truck carrying hazardous materials rolls over and spills chemicals, temporarily
    polluting a town’s water supply.
    To successfully sue the company for strict liability, what would the town need
    to prove?
  • Nothing, because transporting hazardous materials is extremely dangerous
    A mother with a sick child accidentally gives her child a fever reducer that is
    meant for adults, rather than a fever reducer meant for children, because the
    packaging of each is very similar. The child ends up in the hospital due to an
    overdose.
    To successfully sue the pharmaceutical company for strict liability, what
    would the mother need to prove?
  • That mixing up the two medications as a result of their similar packaging
    was a foreseeable customer misuse
    Select the statement that is true of consumer law prior to the 20th century,
    rather than current products liability law.
  • It followed the precept of “buyer beware.”
    17
    Select the statement that is true of current products liability law.
  • It developed as the processes of production and consumption were
    increasingly separated.
    Select the statement that is true of current products liability law.
  • It arose as consumers had much less direct contact with manufacturers than
    in the past.
    Carmen purchased a new lawnmower but she found it difficult to push it over her
    uneven lawn. She removed one of the mower’s safety guards so that it would travel
    more smoothly over the ground. Five weeks later, Carmen mowed the lawn and hit
    a bump that overturned the mower, and she suffered an injury from the blade.
    Carmen sues the manufacturer for negligence, arguing that the lawnmower had a
    defective design that left operators exposed to injury in the case of overturning.
    How strong is the negligence case against the product manufacturer?
  • Weak, because Carmen modified a safety feature of the mower prior to her
    accident.
    A 55-year-old woman begins a prescription medication for heart disease, and
    accidentally overdoses because the medication interacts with a common, over the
    counter drug the woman also takes on a regular basis. When the woman was given
    her prescription, it came with a federally-mandated 10-page list of instructions
    and warnings, which included a warning not to mix the prescription medication
    with the over-the-counter drug. The woman sues the prescription drug maker for
    negligence.
    How strong is the negligence case against the product manufacturer?
  • Weak, because the manufacturer included a warning about the potential
    danger of mixing the drugs
    A laundry detergent company releases new, single use laundry detergent pods that
    are brightly colored, wrapped in plastic, and look like small candies. After several
    children ingest these laundry pods and require hospital care as a result, the
    parents sue for negligence, alleging that the product is defective.
    How strong is the negligence case against the product manufacturer?
  • Strong, because the detergent pods are designed in a way that make them
    unreasonably unsafe.
    18
    Mark purchased a treadmill sold by a large department store and manufactured by
    a third party. While Mark was using the treadmill, his 12-month-old infant crawled
    by and caught his hand in the rear part of the treadmill, causing injury to the
    infant’s hand and arm. There were no warnings of this potential for injury in any of
    the treadmill’s instructions.
    How strong of a case does Mark have against the department store for strict
    product liability?
  • Strong, because the treadmill was unreasonably dangerous in normal use,
    and there was a failure to warn of the danger to infants who might be near the
    treadmill during operation.
    A cologne manufacturer sold an alcohol-based cologne for men with a warning
    limited to the potential for the cologne to catch fire if poured onto a source of
    ignition. John purchased the cologne, applied it to his skin, and then immediately
    lit a cigarette. The cigarette ignited the cologne on his skin, resulting in significant
    burn injuries to his neck and shoulders.
    How strong of a case does John have against the manufacturer for strict
    product liability?
  • Strong, because the company’s warning did not include the potential to
    start a fire on the consumer’s skin from a cigarette, and it would be foreseeable that
    a consumer would light a cigarette after applying the cologne to his skin.
    A manufacturer of an electrically operated muscle relaxer that sends pulses of
    electrical current to the muscles sold this machine through Great Buy, a local
    retail distributor. Sherry purchased one of these machines but did not read the
    instruction booklet before her first use. The instruction booklet had appropriate
    warnings about the danger of having the intensity control up too high and
    counseled users to start out with the intensity on the lowest setting. Unfortunately,
    Sherry started the machine with the intensity turned up to its highest setting,
    causing violent convulsions of her arms and shoulders. Sherry suffered consequent
    injuries to her shoulder joints from the incident.
    How strong of a case does Sherry have against the manufacturer for strict
    product liability?
  • Weak, because Sherry neglected to read the instruction booklet that would
    have warned her against using the machine with the intensity up too high.
    19
    A motorcycle manufacturer was sued by Jeff for strict product liability for serious
    leg injuries he incurred in a low speed motorcycle crash. The theory of recovery
    was that the product was defective for failure to have leg protection devices
    installed, making the product unreasonably dangerous. The manufacturer defended
    on the basis of assumption of risk, in that the danger of a motorcycle crash is
    obvious and foreseeable to the ordinary consumer, so Jeff assumed the risk of such
    a crash.
    How strong is the manufacturer’s defense against Jeff’s claim?
  • Strong, because the dangers of a motorcycle crash are obvious to the
    ordinary consumer, and Jeff knew that there was no leg protection, making his legs
    vulnerable to injury.
    Jose sued an auto manufacturer exclusively for strict product liability when a
    defect in his purchased automobile’s electrical lines caused a fire, leading to a
    total loss of the vehicle. Jose did not suffer any personal injuries as a result of the
    incident. The auto manufacturer defended the claim of strict product liability on
    the basis that there were no personal injuries and the defect in the product only
    resulted in economic loss to Jose.
    How does Jose’s claim stand up to the manufacturer’s defense?
  • Jose is likely to lose, because economic loss relating only to the product
    itself, as opposed to personal injuries, is not typically recoverable under strict
    product liability.
    A scaffold manufacturer was sued for strict product liability by Joe who, while
    working on a construction project, had his scaffold collapse and cause severe back
    injuries. The manufacturer defended on the basis of assumption of risk and was
    able to prove that Joe knew that the scaffold was mis-rigged and decided to use it
    despite this known fact.
    How strong is the manufacturer’s defense against Joe’s claim?
  • Strong, as Joe was quite aware that the scaffold was mis-rigged with a
    potential to collapse as a result and decided to use the mis-rigged scaffold with this
    knowledge.

Get homework help and essay writing assistance

Order custom essays from top writers today and get a professional paper delivered to your email on time.

Do my Assignment