a. What are the arguments that Saul can recover (1) from Bruce and (2) from Third National?

Jump to Solution
Category:

a. What are the arguments that Saul can recover (1) from Bruce and (2) from Third National?

0
0

Saul sold goods to Bruce, warranting that the goods were of a specified quality. The goods were not of the quality warranted, however, and Saul knew this at the time of the sale. Bruce drew and delivered a check payable to Saul and drawn on Third National Bank in the amount of the purchase price. Bruce subsequently discovered the goods were faulty and stopped payment on the check. Third National refused to pay Saul on the check.
 
a. What are the arguments that Saul can recover (1) from Bruce and (2) from Third National?

Saul sold goods to Bruce, warranting that the goods were of a specified quality. The goods were not of the quality warranted, however, and Saul knew this at the time of the sale. Bruce drew and delivered a check payable to Saul and drawn on Third National Bank in the amount of the purchase price. Bruce subsequently discovered the goods were faulty and stopped payment on the check. Third National refused to pay Saul on the check.
 
b. What are the arguments that (1) Bruce should prevail? and (2) Third National should prevail?

Saul sold goods to Bruce, warranting that the goods were of a specified quality. The goods were not of the quality warranted, however, and Saul knew this at the time of the sale. Bruce drew and delivered a check payable to Saul and drawn on Third National Bank in the amount of the purchase price. Bruce subsequently discovered the goods were faulty and stopped payment on the check. Third National refused to pay Saul on the check.
 
c. Who should prevail? Why?

Explanation & AnswerSolution by a verified expert

Explanation

Individual S can argue against Individual B and the bank by stating that it is the responsibility of the drawer and the drawee party to honor the check, even if the transaction involves defective goods. Any issues with the quality of goods transferred shall be considered in a different legal case.

Sample Response

Individual S can argue that when a check is drawn, it should be honored in any case.Additionally,any issue with the goods transferred in the transaction shall be considered in a different legal case.

Purchase this answer to view it. $5
Login/Sign up for free, load your wallet instantly using PayPal or cards and purchase this solution to view it.

Looking for the solution to this or another homework question?

If you need essay writing assistance or homework solutions, log in or sign up for a free account and ask our writers any homework question.