Adler owes Panessi, a police captain, $5,000. Adler threatens that unless Panessi discharges him from the debt,
Adler owes Panessi, a police captain, $5,000. Adler threatens that unless Panessi discharges him from the debt, Adler will disclose the fact that Panessi has on several occasions become highly intoxicated and has been seen in the company of certain disreputable persons. Panessi, induced by fear that such a disclosure would cost him his position or in any event lead to social disgrace, gives Adler a release but subsequently sues to set it aside and recover on his claim. Will Adler be able to enforce the release? Why or why not?
The following isthe evidence supporting the arguments:
o Individual A is going to be able to make the contract with IndividualP to release the personal liability of $5,000. This is because Individual A has a point to prove that under their capacity as a police officer,Individual P was doing acts that are harmful to the society and cannot be expected from the police officer.
o Individual A is not going to be able to make the contract with Individual P because the contract was intended to be made on the basis of personal threats, which are not legally accepted, and Individual P is a police officer who can act as a protector not as a victim to terminate the contract.
There are following two sides of the argument:
o Individual A is going to be able to enforce the contract to escape the debt obligation toward Individual P because Individual P has committed crimes as a police officer.
o Individual A is not going to be able to enforce the contract to escape the debt commitment toward Individual P because making threats for signature is not legal.