In addition, Mansi had received bank statements and failed to examine them.
| ♥ 0 |
Mary Mansi claims that eighteen checks on her account contain forgeries but were nevertheless paid by her bank, Sterling National Bank. The checks bore signatures that, according to Mansi’s handwriting expert, were apparently “written by another person who attempted to simulate her Mary Mansi claims that eighteen checks on her account contain forgeries but were nevertheless paid by her bank, Sterling National Bank. The checks bore signatures that, according to Mansi’s handwriting expert, were apparently “written by another person who attempted to simulate her Mary Mansi claims that eighteen checks on her account contain forgeries but were nevertheless paid by her bank, Sterling National Bank. The checks bore signatures that, according to Mansi’s handwriting expert, were apparently “written by another person who attempted to simulate her |
Explanation
Bank SN may be held responsible since:
It is the bank's duty to take care of transactions related to Plaintiff M's account. Bank SN failed to do so since it has indorsed checks that Plaintiff M has not asked for.
Bank SN is negligent and did not verify signatures before every transaction on Plaintiff M's account to avoid forgery.
Verified Answer
Plaintiff M can argue that Bank SN is liable since:
Plaintiff M has never asked for the checks that the bank has indorsed.
The bank should have verified the signature before encashing the checks; the bank should have identified that the signature is false.
