In February, Brady contracted to construct a house for Fulghum for $206,850. Brady began construction on March 13

Jump to Solution
Category:

In February, Brady contracted to construct a house for Fulghum for $206,850. Brady began construction on March 13

0
0

In February, Brady contracted to construct a house for Fulghum for $206,850. Brady began construction on March 13. Neither during the negotiation of this contract nor when he began performance was Brady licensed as a general contractor as required by North Carolina law. Brady was awarded his builder’s license on October 22, having passed the examination on his second attempt. At that time, he had completed two-thirds of the work on Fulghum’s house. Fulghum paid Brady $204,000. Brady brought suit, seeking an additional $2,850 on the original contract and $29,000 for “additions and changes” Fulghum requested during construction. Is Fulghum liable to Brady? Explain.

Explanation & AnswerSolution by a verified expert

Explanation

The contract between Individual B and Individual F was unenforceable since Individual B did not have the required license, for the construction of the house, at the time of entering the contract.
So, Individual B cannot claim any additional charges for construction from Individual F, even after obtaining the license during the construction period.

Verified Answer

Individual B did not have the required license to construct the house for Individual F at the time of entering the contract; no additional charges were mentioned in the contract. So, Individual F is not liable to pay any additional charges to Individual B.

Purchase this answer to view it. $5
Login/Sign up for free, load your wallet instantly using PayPal or cards and purchase this solution to view it.

Looking for the solution to this or another homework question?

If you need essay writing assistance or homework solutions, log in or sign up for a free account and ask our writers any homework question.