Johnson’s children challenged the validity of the deed. Should the deed be declared invalid due to Ficky’s undue influence? Explain.

Jump to Solution
Category:

Johnson’s children challenged the validity of the deed. Should the deed be declared invalid due to Ficky’s undue influence? Explain.

0
0

Decedent Judith Johnson, a bedridden, lonely woman of eighty-six years, owned outright Greenacre, her ancestral estate. Ficky, her physician and friend, visited her weekly and was held in the highest regard by Johnson. Johnson was extremely fearful of suffering and depended upon Ficky to ease her anxiety and pain. Several months before her death, she deeded Greenacre to Ficky for $10,000. The fair market value of Greenacre at this time was $250,000. Johnson was survived by two children and six grandchildren. Johnson’s children challenged the validity of the deed. Should the deed be declared invalid due to Ficky’s undue influence? Explain.

Explanation & AnswerSolution by a verified expert

Explanation

The agreement of transfer of property includes misrepresentation of the fair market value of $10,000 instead of $250,000.Individual F hasa trustworthy relationship with Individual J. Both reasons point toward the property beingtransferred under undue influence and the contract can be voidable by the legal heir of Individual J.

Verified Answer

The contract is voidable by either party because the contract was made under unjustifiable influence of Individual F on Individual J and the successors of Individual J has theright contention over the contract.

Purchase this answer to view it. $5
Login/Sign up for free, load your wallet instantly using PayPal or cards and purchase this solution to view it.

Looking for the solution to this or another homework question?

If you need essay writing assistance or homework solutions, log in or sign up for a free account and ask our writers any homework question.