Modify the facts in (a) by assuming that Johnson had paid $100,000 for the property in 2013. What result?

Jump to Solution
Category:

Modify the facts in (a) by assuming that Johnson had paid $100,000 for the property in 2013. What result?

0
0

Johnson tells Davis that he paid $150,000 for his farm in 2013 and that he believes it is worth twice that at the present time. Relying upon these statements, Davis buys the farm from Johnson for $225,000. Johnson did pay $150,000 for the farm in 2013, but its value has increased only slightly, and it is presently not worth $300,000. On discovering this, Davis offers to reconvey the farm to Johnson and sues for the return of his $225,000. Result?

Modify the facts in (a) by assuming that Johnson had paid $100,000 for the property in 2013. What result?

Explanation & AnswerSolution by a verified expert

Explanation

The case does not reflect any characteristics of fraud,and Individual D would not be able to receive the damages because of the following reasons:
o The sale between Individuals D and H was done with mutual consent, and no sale agreement disclosing the fact are available in the case.
o Individual J has expressed an uncertain belief on the increase inthe value of the farm in the future. It was considered a fact by Individual D rather than considering it as a mereopinion,while the opinion was not given under aprofessional capacity.
o The Individual J's agenda of entering into the transaction has no clarity,and it cannot be said for sure ifhisintentions werefraudulent or innocent.
o The factual misrepresentation will not be considered material because a general prediction of rising the value of farm to $300,000 in future includes uncertainty, which cannot be considered right by Individual D.
o The Individual D bought the farm for $ 225,000 after relying on the statements that are based on future evaluation, which is not correct.

Verified Answer

Individual D would not be able to sueIndividual J because the transaction between both the parties cannot be considered fraudulent due to the presence of the following factors:

There is no execution of a sale contract for the transaction in the case.
The facts are opinion-based and include uncertain future predictions.
The intention of the Individual J is unclear.
The misrepresentation is not material.
The dependency of Individual D on Individual J's statement is not right.

Purchase this answer to view it. $5
Login/Sign up for free, load your wallet instantly using PayPal or cards and purchase this solution to view it.

Looking for the solution to this or another homework question?

If you need essay writing assistance or homework solutions, log in or sign up for a free account and ask our writers any homework question.