OW CAN YOU ETHICALLY DESIGN A DANGEROUS JOB?
1. How do the basic human rights defined in Chapter 1- free consent, privacy, freedom of conscience, freedom of speech, and due process-apply to professional football players and the safety risks described here?
Human rights are the basic rights granted to individuals as soon as they are born. The following are the five important human rights that are exercised by Game F players like any other human being.
Free consent means an agreement between two parties on certain conditions. No actions may be taken without the consent of the players if the consequence may affect them in any form.
The privacy of the players may be maintained and their confidential information may not be disclosed. The injuries suffered by the players may be kept confidential and may not be shared in public without their permission.
Freedom of conscience is the freedom to have one's own ideas and thoughts. Every player is allowed to think and portray the thoughts in actions if required. The players have the right to ask for safety measures to be taken by the association.
Freedom of speech is the liberty to express one's viewpoint in words. All players have the right to speak on matters that involve the players' professional as well as personal life. The players may provide ideas to the association regarding the ways in which proper safety measures may be taken. The sharing of ideas may help in coming out with great results.
Fairness in the eyes of the judicial system of a country may help the players to be treated equally and fairly in all respects. This involves the laws framed by the government to protect the players and to keep them safe.
Game F players do exercise the following human rights:
Game F players may be asked for consent before any actions is taken. This involves taking the consent of the players regarding the risks associated while playing.
Privacy is another basic human right that is exercised by the players. The players' confidential information may not be made public without the players' permission.
The ideas and views of the players may be entertained before making any decisions. The players possess the freedom to play the sport safely.
The players are free to express their thoughts in words and may not be prevented from doing so. The players may provide ideas to enhance their safety during the game.
Due process involves fairness in front of a judicial body. It involves the laws framed by the government to protect the players.
Evidence supporting the argument that making Sports F safe may lead to good for the players is as follows:
Fewer injuries can enable the players to continue playing and entertaining huge fan base.
The players can be healthy and fit. This can help the players lead a healthy retirement afterward.
Evidence supporting the argument that making Sports F safe may not lead to good for the players is as follows:
There are times when the players need to defend while playing. Defending can lead to instances of injuries. Safe play may force the players to not follow certain rules of the sports.
In Sports F, the players need to follow rules, and injury may occur while abiding by the rules. No injury may hamper the players growth as well as the sports itself.
Evidence supporting the argument that there may be a degree of safety that is ethical in Sports F is as follows:
Various safety measures such as helmets and safety pads are provided to the players.
Various medical facilities are also provided to the players on an immediate basis. Pay compensations are given to the players in case of major injuries.
Evidence supporting the argument that there may not be a degree of safety that is ethical in Sports F is as follows:
Certain rules are designed such that they can push the players toward injuries.
Intense and aggressive matches can make the players disregard the thought of not hurting the other players.
Sports F is a popular sport watched for entertainment by almost all age groups. The players are also injured at a high rate while playing Sports F.
There may be two sides to the argument:
Making Sports F safe may lead to good for the players. This is because healthy players can serve their team for a longer period.
Making Sports F safe may not lead to good for the players. This is because players may not follow all the rules to prevent injuries.
There may be two sides to the argument:
There may be a degree of safety that is ethical in Sports F.
There may not be a degree of safety that is ethical in Sports F.