Peter then sued Doris to recover the $25,000 he had paid her. Will he be successful?
| ♥ 0 |
Doris mistakenly accused Peter’s son, Steven, of negligently burning down her barn. Peter believed that his son was guilty of the wrong and that he, Peter, was personally liable for the damage, as Steven was only fifteen years old. Upon demand made by Doris, Peter paid Doris $25,000 for the damage to her barn. After making this payment, Peter learned that his son had not caused the burning of Doris’s barn and was in no way responsible for its burning. Peter then sued Doris to recover the $25,000 he had paid her. Will he be successful? |
Explanation
It is a case of mistakes made by both parties. Individual P is going toget success in recovering the damages from Individual D because Individual S is not guilty for burning the barns. If Individual P presents justified reasons to save Individual S, the recovery is going tobe more easier.
Verified Answer
Individual P is going tobe able to recover the already paid damages from Individual D by presenting all the facts that Individual S is innocent and not liable for the starting fire in the barnin the legal suit.
Assignment Writers are Online Now!
Need to pay someone to write your paper from scratch? We have experts for all types of assignments.