Solved Questions

Question
Category: Business Law
I am attaching all necessary information including the last paper written and can reuse the facts and issues paragraph  from assignment one (attached) and insert the content from the first few paragraphs. (All attached---the first assignment was a Memo as well as this one).
Category: Business Law
I am attaching a copy of Assignment 1 which is what needs to be prepared.  The additional documents are the general guidelines which need to be followed in preparing the memo. This should be written in "Business Memo" format. The memo needs to be between 750 and 1000 words (no more than).  
updated 5 months ago
Category: Business Law
Muskoka Fuels v. Hassan Steel Fabricators Limited, 2011 ONCA 355 (CanLII) Muskoka Fuels bought a 2000 L fuel storage tank from the manufacturer, Hassan Steel. The life expectancy of such a tank was at least 10 years in service. But five months after putting the tank into service, diesel fuel leaked ...
Editor October 28, 2023
In the case of Muskoka Fuels v. Hassan Steel Fabricators Limited, where a 2000 L fuel storage tank purchased by Muskoka Fuels developed a hole that caused significant damage, Muskoka (View full solution)
updated 5 months ago
Category: Business Law
Behiel v. Primco Limited, 2011 SKQB 65 (CanLII) When the Behiels bought flooring from Primco they informed the salesman, Lee, that they had young children and needed a product that would resist scratching, be durable, and be pleasing to the eye. He recommended the product ultimately purchased, stati...
Editor October 28, 2023
In the case of Behiel v. Primco Limited, the Behiels purchased flooring from Primco based on the recommendation of the salesman, Lee, who assured them that the flooring would meet (View full solution)
updated 5 months ago
Category: Business Law
R. v. Stucky, Ont. C.A., per Weiler and Gillese J.J.A., 2009 ONCA 151 (CanLII), 240 CCC (3d) 141 Stucky was involved in a direct mailing scheme centred in Ontario and aimed at subjects in the United States. These direct mailings contained false and misleading representations contrary to section 52(1...
Editor October 28, 2023
In the case of R. v. Stucky, Stucky was charged under section 52(1) of the Competition Act for his involvement in a direct mailing scheme that contained false and misleading (View full solution)
1 2 3 540