This, of course, as quoted f.o.b. Atlanta and the order will not be subject to cancellation, domestic pack only. Thanking you for the opportunity to offer these garments, we are
Alice solicited an offer from Robett Manufacturing Company to manufacture certain clothing that Alice intended to supply to the government. Alice contends that in a telephone conversation, Robett made an oral offer that she immediately accepted. She then received the following letter from Robett, which, she claims, confirmed their agreement:
Confirming our telephone conversation, we are pleased to offer the 3,500 shirts at $14.00 each and the trousers at $13.80 each with delivery approximately ninety days after receipt of order. We will try to cut this to sixty days if at all possible.
As per the Uniform Commercial Code, there are some key terms that should be followed by an enforceable contract in the context of selling of goods, such as evidence of the selling contract between the parties, the signed acceptability of the contract for its performance, and the description related to the quantity of the goods.
In this case, the signed document shows the selling offer rather than the evidence of the establishment of the contract between the parties. Because of this, the contract is unable to fulfill all the required criteria to be enforceable.
Individual R is not legally bound by the contract because the signed document provided by Individual R in the context of the selling contract does not follow all the specified criteria of the Statute of Fraud, which reflects the unenforceability of the contract.