To identify instances of sexual harassment, the courts may use a “reasonable woman”

To identify instances of sexual harassment, the courts may use a “reasonable woman”

Category:
0
0

To identify instances of sexual harassment, the courts may use a “reasonable woman” standard of what constitutes offensive behavior. This standard is based on the idea that women and men have different ideas of what behavior is appropriate. What are the implications of this distinction? Do you think this distinction is helpful or harmful? Why?

Answer and ExplanationSolution by a verified expert
Explanation Women and men possess different ideologies on various aspects. The differences might have both harmful and helpful effects. The following can be the implications of practi...

Explanation

Women and men possess different ideologies on various aspects. The differences might have both harmful and helpful effects.

The following can be the implications of practising the ideology that men and women possess different perspectives:

Women and men might feel differently. Different ideologies of men and women might provoke men to indulge in acts of harassment frequently.
Women might be stopped from raising their voices for justice. No women might be motivated to come and talk about the harassment they have faced. Men might have a different ideology of justice.

There may be two sides to the argument:

Pieces of evidence that the difference might be helpful:

Different ideologies can help women raise their voices without any fear of being suppressed. The speed at which justice is delivered to women might increase with different ideologies.
Men or women, anyone can face harassment. Different ideologies might bring in support for whoever faces any discrimination.
Pieces of evidence that the difference might be harmful:

Many of the men might feel that it is obvious that women have to face harassment in the workplace. Women feel the opposite about the same.
The instances of different thinking might lead to women facing more situations of inequality and injustice. Men might not support the idea of no harassment against women
Sample Response
Women face sexual harassment and other such discriminatory practices during various cycles of their life. Every individual might have a different perspective of dealing with various situations.

The following can be the implications of practicing the ideology that men and women possess different perspectives:

The sexual harassment cases might increase by practicing such kind of ideology. Men might believe that sexual harassment is an act that can be practiced.
Women and men might differ on the grounds of attaining justice. This can make women more vulnerable to acts of harassment.

There may be two sides to the argument:

The difference might be helpful. This is because in some cases, different perspectives can help women get justice in case of sexual harassment.
The difference might be harmful. This is because women might face more harassment and more inequality might persist.

Purchase this answer to view it.
Login or register for free to purchase this solution with PayPal or credit cards securely


Get help with your essays and assignments

Order custom essays from top writers and get a professional paper delivered to your email on time.

Do my Paper