What rights, if any, have— Penelope against Lucas for discharging her before the end of the agreed term of employment?
| ♥ 0 |
On March 1, Lucas called Craig on the telephone and offered to pay him $190,000 for a house and lot that Craig owned. Craig accepted the offer immediately on the telephone. Later in the same day, Lucas told Annabelle that if she would marry him, he would convey to her the property he then owned, which was the subject of the earlier agreement. On March 2, Lucas called Penelope and offered her $25,000 if she would work for him for the year commencing March 15, and she agreed. Lucas and Annabelle were married on June 25. By this time, Craig had refused to convey the house to Lucas. Thereafter, Lucas renounced his promise to convey the property to Annabelle. Penelope, who had been working for Lucas, was discharged without cause on July 5; Annabelle left Lucas and instituted divorce proceedings. What rights, if any, have— Lucas against Craig for his failure to convey the property? On March 1, Lucas called Craig on the telephone and offered to pay him $190,000 for a house and lot that Craig owned. Craig accepted the offer immediately on the telephone. Later in the same day, Lucas told Annabelle that if she would marry him, he would convey to her the property he then owned, which was the subject of the earlier agreement. On March 2, Lucas called Penelope and offered her $25,000 if she would work for him for the year commencing March 15, and she agreed. Lucas and Annabelle were married on June 25. By this time, Craig had refused to convey the house to Lucas. Thereafter, Lucas renounced his promise to convey the property to Annabelle. Penelope, who had been working for Lucas, was discharged without cause on July 5; Annabelle left Lucas and instituted divorce proceedings. What rights, if any, have— Annabelle against Lucas for failure to convey the house to her? On March 1, Lucas called Craig on the telephone and offered to pay him $190,000 for a house and lot that Craig owned. Craig accepted the offer immediately on the telephone. Later in the same day, Lucas told Annabelle that if she would marry him, he would convey to her the property he then owned, which was the subject of the earlier agreement. On March 2, Lucas called Penelope and offered her $25,000 if she would work for him for the year commencing March 15, and she agreed. Lucas and Annabelle were married on June 25. By this time, Craig had refused to convey the house to Lucas. Thereafter, Lucas renounced his promise to convey the property to Annabelle. Penelope, who had been working for Lucas, was discharged without cause on July 5; Annabelle left Lucas and instituted divorce proceedings. What rights, if any, have— Penelope against Lucas for discharging her before the end of the agreed term of employment? |
Part A
Explanation
The law will be applicable only if it is in the written form. In this case, Individual L makes a mutual oral contract with Individual C for selling a specific property via a phone call. However, after few months, Individual C refuses to sell the property to Individual L. Additionally, for the applicability of the law related to the selling of property, the contract must be in writing. A written agreement provides the right to both parties to file a suit against each other.
Verified Answer
In this case, there is a lack of a written contract between Individuals L and C. Because of this Individual L cannot take any action against Individual C for not executing the relevant contract.
Part B
Explanation
There is lack of a written contract or a memorandum of the agreement between Persons A and L, As a result, Person A has no right against Person L.
Verified Answer
In this case, Person A cannot take any action against Person L for not delivering the ownership of a house after marrying Person L because Person L makes an oral promise with Person A, and there is no written contract with between them.
Explanation
There exists an oral contract in respect of employment between Persons P and L. Owing to the lack of written agreement, Person P is unable to file a suit against Person L for breaching the contract that was made by Person L with Person P for a specific period of time. A contract should be in writing and mutually acceptable for the implementation of any specific law.
Verified Answer
In this case, there is a lack of a written contract between Persons P and L because of which Person P cannot take any action against Person L for not executing the relevant contract.
